[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

A Holistic Model. Washington DC: National Defense University.
Glasstone, Samuel, and Philip J. Dolan. 1977. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Third
Edition. Washington DC: United States Department of Defense.
Green, Philip. 1966. Deadly Logic, The Theory of Nuclear Deterrence. Ohio: Ohio State
University Press.
Hambling, David. 2002. Bunker-Busters set to go Nuclear, New Scientist, 9 November.
Hewlett, Richard G., and Oscar E. Anderson Jr., The New World: A History of
the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Volume 1, 1939/1946 (Oak Ridge,
Tennessee: U.S. AEC Technical Information Center, 1972), pp. 723-724.
Headquarters Department of the Army. 1996. Field Manual 100-30 Nuclear
Operations. VA, US Army Training and Doctrine Command.
Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis Working Group. 1994. Proliferation, Theater
Missile Defense, and U.S. Security. New Hampshire: Puritan Press.
Jackson, Korey V., and J. W. Korsnick. 2002. The  New Triad of the 2001 Nuclear
Posture Review and its Impact on the U.S. Army, NBC Report 02
(spring/summer): 21  23.
Martin, Laurence. 1979. Strategic Thought in the Nuclear Age. Maryland: The Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Mekalia, Jonathon. 2003. Nuclear Earth Penetrator Weapons. Washington D.C.:
Congressional Research Service.
Nelson, Robert W. 2001. Low-Yield Earth-Penetrating Nuclear Weapons, The Journal of
the Federation of American Scientists (2001): 1-8.
Paine, Christopher E. 1998. Does the US Science-based Stockpile Stewardship Program
Pose a Proliferant Threat, Science and Global Security volume 7, 151-193.
Reynold, Raymond. 1983. Earth Penetrating Weapon. New Mexico: Sandia National
Laboratories.
Rivlin, Alice M.1983. Modernizing U.S. Strategic Offensive Forces: The
Adminstration s Program and Alternatives, A CBO Study. Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office.
54
Robinson, Paul C. 2001. Pursuing a New Nuclear Weapons Policy for the 21st Century
Available from http://www.sandia.gov/media/whitepaper/2001-04-Robinson.htm.
Internet. Accessed on 20 January 2003.
Sandia Laboratories, and U.S. Army Missile Research and Development Command.
1977. Pershing II Advanced Development Flight Tests. New Mexico: Sandia
National Laboratories.
Schneider, Barry R. 1995.  Policy Shift: The Defense Counter-proliferation
Initiative, Radical Responses to Radical Regimes McNair Paper 41 (May 1995):
1.
Speed Roger, D. 1979. Strategic Deterrence in the 1980s. California: Hoover
Institution Press.
Sterngold, James. 2002. Resurgence for Nuclear Labs. San Francisco Chronicle,
22 October.
Turabian, Kate L. 1996. A manual for writers. 6th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
United States Congress. Senate. 2001. Report to Congress on the Defeat of Hard and
Deeply Buried Targets; submitted in October 2001 by the Secretary of Defense in
conjunction with the Secretary of Energy, in response to Section 1044 of the
Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, P.L.
106-398. Available from http://thomas.loc.gov. Internet. Accessed on 15
November 2002.
Unites States Congress. Senate. 2002. Committee on Armed Services. Hearing: Nuclear
Posture Review. Available from http://thomas.loc.gov. Internet. Accessed on 1
November 2002.
Wall Street Journal Online, 2002. Unmighty Europe. Available from
http://classes.igpa.uiuc.edu/j-giertz/defense.htm. Internet. Accessed on 11
February 2003.
Ward, Thomas. 2001. Thermobaric (TB) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
(ACTD)Available from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report.htm.
Internet. Accessed on 5 January 2003.
Wilson, Heather et al. 2003. Differentiation and Defense: An Agenda for the Nuclear
Weapons Program: Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55
Wright, David and Lisbeth Gronlund. 2002. Earth Penetrating Weapons. Available from
http://www.ucsusa.org/security/epw.html. Internet. Accessed 30 October 2002.
Younger, Stephen M. 2000. Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century. Los Alamos
National Laboratory Report, LAUR-002850. Available from
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/doctrine/doe/younger.htm. Accessed 20
February 2003.
56
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST
Combined Arms Research Library
U.S. Army Command and General Staff College
250 Gibbon Ave.
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-2314
Defense Technical Information Center/OCA
825 John J. Kingman Rd., Suite 944
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218
Mr. Richard H.Wright
Combined Arms Doctrine Department
USACGSC
1 Reynolds Ave.
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-1352
Dr. Harry S.Orenstein
Combined Arms Doctrine Department
USACGSC
1 Reynolds Ave.
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-1352
LtCol Patrick R. Allen
Air Force Element
USACGSC
1 Reynolds Ave.
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-1352
57
CERTIFICATION FOR MMAS DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
1. Certification Date: 6 June 2003
2. Thesis Author: Major Thomas Moore
3. Thesis Title: Does the United States Need a New Nuclear Earth Penetrating Weapon
4. Thesis Committee Members: ,Chairman
Signatures : Richard H. Wright, M.A.
,Member
Harold S. Orenstein, Ph.D.
,Member
LtCol Patrick R. Allen, M.A.
5. Distribution Statement: See distribution statements A-X on reverse, then circle appropriate
distribution statement letter code below:
A B C D E F X SEE EXPLANATION OF CODES ON REVERSE
If your thesis does not fit into any of the above categories or is classified, you must coordinate
with the classified section at CARL.
6. Justification: Justification is required for any distribution other than described in Distribution
Statement A. All or part of a thesis may justify distribution limitation. See limitation justification
statements 1-10 on reverse, then list, below, the statement(s) that applies (apply) to your thesis
and corresponding chapters/sections and pages. Follow sample format shown below:
EXAMPLE
Limitation Justification Statement / Chapter/Section / Page(s)
Direct Military Support (10) / Chapter 3 / 12
Critical Technology (3) / Section 4 / 31
Administrative Operational Use (7) / Chapter 2 / 13-32
Fill in limitation justification for your thesis below:
Limitation Justification Statement / Chapter/Section / Page(s)
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
7. MMAS Thesis Author's Signature:
58
STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. (Documents with this statement
may be made available or sold to the general public and foreign nationals).
STATEMENT B: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only (insert reason and date ON
REVERSE OF THIS FORM). Currently used reasons for imposing this statement include the following:
1. Foreign Government Information. Protection of foreign information.
2. Proprietary Information. Protection of proprietary information not owned by the U.S.
Government.
3. Critical Technology . Protection and control of critical technology including technical data with
potential military application.
4. Test and Evaluation. Protection of test and evaluation of commercial production or military
hardware.
5. Contractor Performance Evaluation. Protection of information involving contractor performance
evaluation.
6. Premature Dissemination. Protection of information involving systems or hardware from
premature dissemination. [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]